tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616334792942045797.post3976790375490105516..comments2008-06-25T06:08:55.566-07:00ljshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12788869184713346996lyttonsmith@mac.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616334792942045797.post-931660668045012032008-06-25T06:08:00.000-07:002008-06-25T06:08:00.000-07:00Interesting comment, especially coming from a visit to the rare books room - a meeting of visitors, the present, and presence if ever there were one!ljshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12788869184713346996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2616334792942045797.post-80050430969998122942008-06-24T08:56:00.000-07:002008-06-24T08:56:00.000-07:00quick comment, (and apologies if I'm off the mark after a <I>very</I> quick read) as on my way out the door of the Rare Books room, but I want to extend your last comment more explicitly, because by making a record <I>revisable</I>, you're also making it re<I>visit</I>able, opening it to being meaningful whether or not its initial <I>present</I> included the visitor's <I>presence</I>.<BR/><BR/>Too many italics! Forgive me.Mary Kate Hurleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14892991966276345782noreply@blogger.com